After
reading Second Avenue by Frank O’Hara I came into a few obstacles. For
starters, it is one of those difficult poems that I've heard so much about. In
fact, the first time I actually read it I had absolutely no idea what was going
on. While I tried to understand everything most of what I read went right
passed me. There was a lot of hallucinating imagery, and a few more swears than
I've been used to in a poem. There was a lot of anger that I sensed, and a
weird amount of eroticism that I found tense and awkward. However, after the analyzing
it in class, and spending a good 45 minutes looking at a few more than a dozen
lines, I can say some things about this poem.
I couldn’t tell you what was going on in the entire poem, I read it twice, and it kind of sounds like jibber jabber to me, so for that I failed. However, I did get something out of the second stanza after analyzing it to hell and back. After I tackled that, I was able to look at it in a different light. However, there isn’t enough time in the world to look at the whole thing.
I couldn’t tell you what was going on in the entire poem, I read it twice, and it kind of sounds like jibber jabber to me, so for that I failed. However, I did get something out of the second stanza after analyzing it to hell and back. After I tackled that, I was able to look at it in a different light. However, there isn’t enough time in the world to look at the whole thing.
There
was a lot of talk about anger in nature, and a loom at a dead opossum (at least
I thought it was dead). The anger is vapid, as it’s description is dense.
I liked to think that essentially this poem is a reflection, after seeing road-kill,
the speaker of the poem looks at nature, god, and himself of the cause of this,
and how it’s impact is as negative as positive. One line in particular “Is it a
triumph?” had me questioning the whole stanza for a decent period of time, as I
look at as a question whether or not this poor possums death was a good or bad
thing.
The poem ends on probably one of the most
beautifully clichéd sentiments, “laughter at desire, and disorder, and dying”.
This is something I must have heard in a poem before, but nonetheless it is
thought provoking.
The
poems not bad, but it’s not for me. I don’t like playing games, I like being
told what’s what, and this poem does anything but.